|
|
| (33 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Some factors to consider when choosing which college to attend are:
| | Choosing a college can be a very difficult task for students. The links below help you navigate the process. |
|
| |
|
| === The prestige of the college that you attend matters ===
| | * [[College selection: how it relates to the college application process]]: Upshot: College selection matters in terms of choosing what colleges to apply to in the first place (particularly if application fees are a cost hurdle), choosing how to tailor one's application materials to appeal to the specific college admissions officers, and choosing what college to select after getting admissions decisions. It becomes even more important for people using the Early Application. |
| | * [[College selection: getting reliable information about colleges]]: Upshot: it's hard, because of distortions. The best source of information appears to be [http://www.collegeconfidential.com/ College Confidential]. |
| | * [[College selection: factors to consider]]: Upshot: prestige, flexibility for students, department-specific strengths, and cost are major factors to consider. |
| | * [[Intracollege versus intercollege variation]]: Upshot: variation within colleges is often more significant than variation between colleges (among the colleges you have a realistic chance of getting into). This factor mitigates against worrying too much about getting into one speciifc college. |
|
| |
|
| Some people say that you shouldn't worry too much about where you go to college, because it won't matter later on in life. While it's true that where you went to college tends to matter less over time, it still has an impact on your life trajectory: the opportunities that are available to you early in life affect the opportunities that are available to you later on, and more prestigious colleges generally offer better opportunities than less prestigious colleges do. | | Some more specialized pages: |
|
| |
|
| There's a case to be made for focusing on personal growth during high school rather than getting into a good college: your personal growth during high school also shapes the opportunities that are available to you in the future. But to the extent possible, you should work to grow personally ''while'' working on getting into a good college.
| | * [[College selection: deciding based on your intended major]] |
| | * [[Choosing between a public college and a private college]] |
| | * [[Pros and cons of attending a large college]] |
|
| |
|
| Some advantages of going to a prestigious college are:
| | Also related: |
|
| |
|
| ==== Higher earnings ====
| | * [[College: deciding whether to go]] |
| | |
| [http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-Salaries_for_Colleges_by_Type-sort.html Data] show that mid-career annual earnings of UC Riverside graduates ~ $81k/year and of UC Berkeley graduates ~ $112k/year. UC Berkeley is generally considered the most prestigious University of California college, and UC Riverside among the least prestigious University of California colleges. This suggests that going to a more prestigious college increases your expected earnings. | |
| | |
| The actual increase in earnings is less than the $31k/year difference: UC Berkeley students are probably more ambitious than students at UC Riverside, and also have higher ability even before going to UC Berkeley, so that one would expect a gap even if they all attended the same schools. But the gap partially comes from prestige of school. Employers generally are more likely to hire a student from a prestigious school than a non-prestigious school, because going to a prestigious school signals that you have higher ability than other people do. For [http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2011/11/how_elite_firms.html example], high paying investment banks, law firms, and management consulting firms show a strong preference for graduates of the top 4 ranked universities in the country.
| |
| | |
| ==== Peer group ====
| |
| | |
| Going to a more prestigious college exposes you to stronger students. [http://www.benkuhn.net/ Ben Kuhn] at Harvard [http://lesswrong.com/lw/ikh/course_selection_based_on_instructor/9pv5 describes] advantages of being in a peer group with stronger students:
| |
| | |
| ''By watching how more competent people work and think, you can often pick up useful study habits and better techniques for the subject you're studying [...] Both more advanced students and instructors can be very useful for the academic advice they provide later. Knowing talented students has given me info about several excellent courses, as well as summer opportunities, I wouldn't otherwise have known about. A professor who can become a good mentor is also invaluable''
| |
| | |
| Making connections with stronger students is also useful for networking later on in life, because stronger students tend to be in positions of greater influence later on than weaker students are.
| |
| | |
| === Information about what a college is like is often unreliable ===
| |
| | |
| You should heavily discount a lot of information that's out there about what a given college is like. Some reasons for this are:
| |
| | |
| ====Distortionary marketing====
| |
| | |
| A college's promotional materials and admissions officers are generally distortionary: they exaggerate the college's positive qualities while omitting discussion of its negative qualities.
| |
| | |
| ====Unrepresentative information in college guidebooks====
| |
| | |
| The [http://www.amazon.com/The-Fiske-Guide-Colleges-2014/dp/1402260644 Fiske Guide to Colleges 2014] describes its methodology:
| |
| | |
| ''Administrators were ... asked to recruit a cross section of students to complete another electronic questionnaire with questions relating to what it is like to be a student at their particular college or university.''
| |
| | |
| College administrators are motivated to portray their universities favorably, and so one would expect them to recruit students who are most likely to say good things about their universities. So one can't trust the students' responses to be representative of what the college is like. | |
| | |
| ====Current students and alumni being biased in favor of their schools====
| |
| | |
| After somebody makes a choice, he or she generally wants to believe that he or she made the right choice. So people who have chosen to attend a college will often exaggerate its virtues and minimize its faults.
| |
| | |
| ====Sour grapes====
| |
| | |
| People who are rejected from a given college, or who don't apply because they know they can't get in, will sometimes have a "sour grapes" reaction, and be motivated to believe that the college isn't good.
| |
| | |
| === Diversity gives you more options ===
| |
| | |
| Some colleges give you more flexibility with respect to the classes that you take, the classmates you spend time with, and the faculty who you interact with. The more flexibility you have, the more potential you have to make the most out of your college years. Of course, the effect that this will have on your experience depends on your ability to use the flexibility to your advantage.
| |
| | |
| Some ways in which colleges differ in the flexibility that they offer are:
| |
| | |
| ====Core requirements====
| |
| | |
| Some colleges have more required courses than others. For example, Brown University is known for its "open curriculum," and has very few requirements
| |
| | |
| ''In 1850, Brown's fourth president, Francis Wayland, argued that students should have greater freedom in pursuing a higher education, so that each would be able to "study what he chose, all that he chose, and nothing but what he chose." A century later, this vision became the basis for a new approach to general education at Brown: the open curriculum. Rather than defining a broad set of distribution requirements, the open curriculum gives students the freedom to choose for themselves.'' — from [http://www.brown.edu/academics/college/degree/curriculum here].
| |
| | |
| By way of contrast, University of Chicago is known for its "Core curriculum," and has many required courses:
| |
| | |
| ''This famed Core curriculum, a model for American general education, is the University of Chicago student’s introduction to the tools of inquiry used in every discipline—science, mathematics, humanities, and social sciences. The goal is not just to transfer knowledge, but to raise fundamental questions and become familiar with the powerful ideas that shape our society. Not only does the curriculum provide the background for any major and for continuing study after graduation, it also provides a common experience for all students in the College. All students have taken the same sorts of classes and read the same kinds of texts, struggling and triumphing over the same sorts of ideas. This gives every student a common vocabulary of ideas and skills, no matter his or her background before coming to the College. [...] The Core takes about 1/3 of your time at the College, but could be less depending on AP/IB credit and placement testing.'' — from [https://collegeadmissions.uchicago.edu/academics/core.shtml here].
| |
| | |
| We believe that all else being equal, it's better for self-directed and strategic students to attend colleges with fewer required courses rather than more required courses, and that the benefits of a "common vocabulary" that University of Chicago cites are probably overstated.
| |
| | |
| Some colleges that require many courses are excellent choices for a given person: the "core requirements" consideration should be weighed against other considerations.
| |
| | |
| ====College size====
| |
| | |
| The larger a college, the larger the pool of students and professors who you have access to. Attending a large college can improve your prospects of finding your "niche" within the college. For example, if you're an international student and would like to spend time with people from your country, going to a larger college will generally improve your prospects for doing so.
| |
| | |
| Some people go to a small college because they want the intimacy of being in a small community. This may be an important consideration for some people, but it's important to note that one can find intimacy in a larger college by finding small groups of people who share your interests.
| |
| | |
| Going to a larger college can also offer you more options for courses to take. For example:
| |
| | |
| * A large college might offer honors discrete math in addition to a standard discrete math course.
| |
| * Larger colleges generally offer a greater number of highly specialized electives than smaller colleges do.
| |
| | |
| === Differences within a college are often bigger than differences between colleges ===
| |
| | |
| * Different academic subjects can have very different flavors, and open up different options for you. What you choose to major in can have a bigger impact on your life than what college you attend.
| |
| * Instructor quality within a given department can vary a great deal.
| |
| * If you attend a college with 5,000+ students, there will be many different kinds of students, and your social experience will depend heavily on which of them you spend time with.
| |
| | |
| If you're choosing between two colleges of the same prestige level,
| |